Skip to main content

The Ballad of Raja Malhi Prakash and Sirmour's History - Some Scrambled Thoughts

I was just walking through some documents I had saved over the years, when it struck me that there has been very little new research work or relook into the history of the hill states. One particular format has been the examination of oral ballads, very few of which seem to be available in popular culture today. However, that was certainly not the case in the British era, when much field work seems to have been done by scholars of Europe on the subject, as they panned across the state of the Lahore kingdom and their adjunct territories. Sirmour was a Small Princely state along the Yamuna river's course While their purpose may have been malevolent in nature, many interesting insights got captured over the course of their work, and replication or improvement on the same seems to be rather scarce, especially in the context of what the European scholars used to call the "Punjab Hill States". One such case was on Sirmour, where very little information can be found in the publi...
Post a Comment

Clearing the Air on 'Purchasing Kashmir'

Maharaja Gulab Singh (sourced from Wikipedia)
A lot of controversy goes into the questions about the Treaty of Amritsar and the role played by Maharaja Gulab Singh in taking over the province of Kashmir. One must certainly put into context the manner in which the state came into existence post the treaty to highlight a false notion that has always stuck to the ever false narrative peddled about it.

Contrary to what others believe, Maharaja Gulab Singh did not pay any sums to purchase Kashmir. There are several books that will point out that particular instance on the manner in which Kashmir came under Dogra rule. 1845 had seen the fight between the Sikh rulers of Punjab and the British East India Company. While it is fashionable to call Hindus villains, fact remains that a certain section of the Darbar had given the British the opportunity to declare war against the Lahore Darbar. Subsequent to their defeat in the first of the three Anglo-Sikh Wars, vakils were appointed on drawing up the terms of the surrender. It is here that Maharaja Gulab Singh comes into picture.

Gulab Singh was the Vakil of the Lahore Darbar in the entire event, and there has been much noise made about the treaty and it's terms. Let's get some facts straight hereon, so that certain misnomers can be corrected.

1.Treaty of Amritsar was part of the arrangement of the terms of defeat of the Lahore Darbar.

2. Initially, 1.5 core Nanakshahi rupees were to be paid. However, the Lahore Darbar expressed its inability to do so. Hence, 75 lakh Nanakshahi rupee were the indemnity that the Lahore Darbar finally had to pay to the British EIC. There was no purchase of the province of Kashmir.

Subsequently, it must be pointed out that the British deliberately took away land from the state of Punjab, particularly the Hill States, since it was noted that the Sikh empire should be kept under watch. It was not just Kashmir - entire region up to the boundary Beas, including the regions of Kangra, Nurpur, Chenab Valley, Chamba and Mandi that were taken away from the Darbar.




So why did the British EIC give up on the region? The British EIC officials realized a few hard truths about access to the region in general and the harshness of the terrain. Avoiding direct conflict with the Afghans and the possible encounter with the Russians was to be avoided at any cost. Hence, a decision was taken to give up some of that territory. Since only 75 lakhs could be arranged, Kangra and Nurpur were retained by the British as they served the boundary with the whittled Sikh empire and could provide easy access in times of war. The more inaccessible regions, Chamba, Chenab Valley and even several parts of Mandi were essentially handed to Maharaja Gulab Singh for management, who was still in the service of the Lahore Durbar for management as his fee for the vakalat.


Another thing to add - while all of this was ongoing, Ladakh had already been annexed by the Dogras, under the general ship of Zorawar Singh, who would go on to invade Tibet in a legendary but disastrous campaign.

And that is how a large part of the Jammu and Kashmir as was known came into being.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wazir Ram Singh Pathania, and the memory of Shahpurkandi

Poster describing Shahpurkandi Fort (courtesy Panjab Digital Library )   Pathankot. A sleepy border town today. A land of bravehearts, and more renowned for a terror attack on the air base in 2016. Yet, there was once a history of Pathankot that few remember in public memory today. Especially of Shahpur Kandi.  Shahpur Kandi is a Fort that falls in Punjab today. It used to be part of the premise of the Nurpur princely state. Nurpur was ruled by the Pathanias, a dynasty that was known as much for bravery and wit as it was for its patronage of art, patronizing the Nurpur shaili of Pahari paintings. Yet, at least nine years before the Indian war for Independence that took place in 1857, an uprising shook the British East India Company to its core.  It was 1848, and Ram Singh Pathania, who was going incognito post the collapse of the Lahore Durbar, had decided to repatriate himself with his father Sham Singh Pathania to Nurpur. Taking the title of Wazir there, these supposedl...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Living Memories of Skanda

Skanda, or Kartikeya, was a very important deity upto the 9th century AD across North India, before it starts to fade. Several Gupta era as well as other period sculptures and panels and wall panels evidence the importance,as can be evidenced in the National Museum collection in New Delhi. For instance, there is a 6th century AD panel of Skanda from the Punjab region (shown on the side)highlights a beautiful peacock on which Skanda is seated, with his trademark spear. Professor T S Maxwell writes about the earliest references to Skanda and his iconography in the north as follows: ' Probably the earliest six-headed representations of this god-and, apparently, of his consort-occur upon coins minted by the Yaudheyas, a traditionally warlike people settled in modern Rajasthan who 'lived by their weapons' (āyudhajīvinaḥ) and had Skanda as their principal god. Although the Yaudheyas persisted as a social group during the rule of the Guptas,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Iconoclasm in India - Stories from Himachal

Iconoclasm is a known reality of India's violent invasion period. People trying to deny it are lying to themselves, be it out of naivety or malice. Dr. Meenakshi Jain, a highly underrated historian, in a recent public lecture, discussed her new research project on this very important topic, and how she has been collecting evidence to the same from various sources. While there are several well documented evidences across many parts of India, including the Northern plains, what Dr Jain has found so far is a broad lack of accounts of important events being captured in the hill regions, particularly in the North-Western Himalayas. To that end, there seem to be signs, based on my own research, that there seem to be cases that are famous and may be preserved in oral traditions and written records in various ways, but need to be pieced together by proper historians, though of course people will deep interests can certainly help contribute by finding out more and sharing records. Entr...
Post a Comment
Read more