Skip to main content

Gulab Singh and the Battle of Jammu 1809

The year was 1808. The place, Jammu. Raja Jaid Singh was placed on the throne of Jammu to be its king, supported by the presence of Mian Mota Singh, the all-powerful kingmaker of Jammu. In this period of madness in the province of Jammu, one hoped that Jammu would witness a semblance of balance and stability being created. Jammu had been in a free fall following the death of Raja Brijraj Dev. Sampuran Singh, the successor, succumbed to smallpox, leading to the situation that a new successor had to be found desperately. In the scramble, the name of Jaid Singh came forward, and with Mian Mota Singh’s support, Jaid Singh ascended the throne. Raja Brijraj Dev of Jammu ( painting with San Diego Museum of Art) Contributing to the constant madness in Jammu were the Khalsa forces who would raid Jammu and pillage it constantly, devoiding it of its wealth. The 1783 pillage of Jammu remained afresh in the minds of the people and the aristocrats alike - for two months, one witnessed not a single

The Reality of 1931 'Martyr's Day'


Kashmir 1931 - Finding the Truth (courtesy MediaVigil)


Maharaja Hari Singh, as I pointed out in an earlier post, had committed to a formation of an independent India at the 1931 round table. Since then, every occasion was sought by the british to put him down. An occasion was created in 1931 which is often touted as Martyrs Day by Kashmiri Muslim separatists. However, a careful examination of the entire incident tells one that the 20 June incident was nothing but a fabrication.

To this day, the incidents of Jammu can not be linked to the reason for the protests in Srinagar. Whatever fabrications the entire cabal may try, fact of the matter remains that Jammu saw its affairs entirely separately in matters of religion and had full faith in the Maharaja's Raj. The cases of Jammu Jail and Udhampur will case are entirely fabrications, references to which can still not be found in official records. If there were such cases, one wonders why there are no such records in the archives, which to this day remain some of the best princely state archives within India. In any case, the real set of events essentially are often hidden. Especially the fact that is hidden is that the atmosphere within the Kashmir Valley had already been set up for communal violence to take place, and the overall national scenario.

Building Up to 1931 

1931 followed the Round table in London, which had miffed the British, who decided to activate the incendiary elements. The Muslim League was given a free hand by the British to tour India - one must recall that the 1930 Pakistan resolution was already out and had been adopted by the Muslim League. Kashmir was envisaged as one of the crucial components of the geography of the proposed state of Pakistan. Consequently, Muslim League leaders had entered the state of Jammu and Kashmir and were giving inflammatory speeches to inflame communal tensions. While Jammu was under control, Kashmir Valley saw the flaring up of tensions, with leaders like Sheikh Abdullah and Maulvi Yusuf Shah also collaborating in the game. The Muslim League had been invited by the Muslim Conference led by Maulvi Yusuf Shah to create the backdrop. Moreover with the promotion of Muslim Reading Rooms, the British Resident was also abetting the communal tensions within the Kashmir Valley.

The Alleged Incident

On 20 June 1931 news spread like wildfire in downtown Srinagar that a desecrated copy of the Qur'an was found in a latrine. A cook, Abdul Qadir, apparently who curiously worked for the British Resident, claimed to have found the burnt pages of the Qur'an stuffed down a latrine. The man was quickly paraded across the city, whereby he made several incendiary speeches flaming passions, calling for action against the kafirs. He had openly and brazenly called for actions against Hindus, accusing them of having undertaken the Act.

Rioting followed, whereby shops and establishments of Kashmiri Hindus were particularly targeted. Houses were also burnt down amid severe stone pelting. The police eventually tried to take things under control, but maddening crowds were trying to storm the city's important places. To quote G S Raghavan,

"All efforts to pacify the unruly mob proved futile. While there was commotion outside the jail there was also disturbance inside, prisoners tried to force open the iron gates. About this time, certain prisoners were being taken from the court to the jail. The crowd stoned the policemen and the prisoners were liberated. The prospect was by no means satisfactory. The District Magistrate's order was defied, who had been summoned to the spot by the time, and had declared the crowd to be an "unlawful assembly" and ordered its dispersal. The order was defied and finding that the mob could neither be pacified nor dispersed, the District Magistrate directed fire to be opened. The crowd fell off but later it re-assembled and resumed stoning. It had to be dispersed with a Lathi charge. Part of the crowd, however moved towards the Hari Parbat Fort: the cavalry had to pursue it and disperse it again. A section of the recalcitrant's proceeded towards a place called Maharaj Ganj which is a business locality and loot over an extensive area followed. From Bhori Kadal to Alikadal a long stretch, Hindu shops were raided. Other localities such as Safakadal, Ganji, Khud and Nawakadal too formed the centers of loot. Bazar streets were littered with property, books of accounts were burnt: the Hindu shopkeepers were molested, in short, pandemonium prevailed."

Subsequently it was in police action that people died. However, these efforts to control the unruly crowds and restore law and order is today shown as an uprising against the Maharaja's Draconian rule. What is worse is that there has been severe glossing of the riots and mayhem, especially the targeting of Kashmiri Pandits and other Hindus in Srinagar. However violence also spread to other parts of the state.

The British Conspiracy (?) and its Aftermath

One question about the incident has to date never been addressed. Who was this Abdul Qadir? The cook of the British Resident had turned up only around this time, and within a matter of days of entering the Valley, was conveniently giving speeches, citing verses from the Qur'an to inflame passions. He was the sole witness to the incident. Moreover, in his speeches he asserted that the book forbade Muslims to subject themselves to an infidel Hindu ruler, and also incited the Muslim crowds to take up cow slaughter and break the law.

Interestingly, he was arrested and was was to undergo a trial when the Srinagar Central jail was stormed, and the man slunk out, never to be seen again or heard again in the Valley.

Looking back, Abdul Qadir seemed to be a British Resident's asset, who was used to create mayhem in the Valley. Upon examining in the larger picture, it was clear that the background for inciting communal violence to cause embarrassment to Mahraja Hari Singh and put pressure on him seems to have been formulated by the British government at some level. Riots citing this were also incited in Mirpur, Kotli and Muzaffarabad, where Hindus were also attacked by hordes of jihadi elements.

Subsequently, the turn of events seem to indirectly confirm the same. As part of the enhanced activities of the Great Game going on, British Indian government had been pressuring Maharaja Hari Singh to cede Gilgit-Baltistan. They finally succeeded, when in 1935, the Maharaja granted the British what they wanted - the lease of the Gilgit agency.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dutt Kavi's Memories of the Jammu-Kangra Battle - Thoughts on the Brajraj Panchasika

Raja Ranjit Dev of Jammu (courtesy Christie's) Reading through the Rajdarshani, the annals of Jammu's history as written by Ganesh Das Badehra, has been a rather engaging exercise. The deeper one goes into the text, the more layers on the missing links to the history of the Panjab Hill States open up. One particular aspect of the history that gets less highlighted (rather ignored) is the rivalry of Jammu and Kangra. It is rather intriguing that the popular memory gap has been so poorly discussed and deliberated upon anywhere. One such instance, thanks to Dr. S S Charak’s work on a critical edition of the Rajdarshani, has been rather useful.  It is not surprising that there is rivalry -through the history of the region, these were the two biggest princely states, and so it was but natural that competition for influence would take place. Curiously, the two have also seen continuity of dynasties for more than a millennium at the least. While the rivalries of Nagarkot or Kangra and

The Living Memories of Skanda

Skanda, or Kartikeya, was a very important deity upto the 9th century AD across North India, before it starts to fade. Several Gupta era as well as other period sculptures and panels and wall panels evidence the importance,as can be evidenced in the National Museum collection in New Delhi. For instance, there is a 6th century AD panel of Skanda from the Punjab region (shown on the side)highlights a beautiful peacock on which Skanda is seated, with his trademark spear. Professor T S Maxwell writes about the earliest references to Skanda and his iconography in the north as follows: ' Probably the earliest six-headed representations of this god-and, apparently, of his consort-occur upon coins minted by the Yaudheyas, a traditionally warlike people settled in modern Rajasthan who 'lived by their weapons' (āyudhajīvinaḥ) and had Skanda as their principal god. Although the Yaudheyas persisted as a social group during the rule of the Guptas,

Kavi Gambhir Rai's Rendition of Raja Jagat Singh's Rebellion

A possible portrait (dated 1730) of Raja Jagat Singh Pathania (from the Eva and Konrad Seitz collection) History is a subject of speculation as much as it is about evidence. The more you read, the more you see gray areas everywhere. However, certain fields of history, like that of the Himalayan states for instance, is a rather problematic subject. Insufficient publicly available evidence, lack of local interest, and 'remoteness' from the larger picture has often rendered the subject to ignominy. However, it is a small but earnest attempt of this blog to keep exploring and writing on the subject in one way or the other.  A few months ago, I had talked of the Brajraj Panchashika, and seen the trends of Braj bhasha kavita in the region serving as evidence to suggest certain historical trends. However, there was definitely a broader trend in the region of such Braj bhasha ballads. The ballad of Raja Jagat Singh by Kavi Gambhir Rai is another example of this, and the more you read,